Tuesday . May 23 . 2017
         
 
Share |
AirAsia not proceeding with flights from Singapore to India, China
Shekhar Niyogi, Kolkata, January 31, 2013
 

FOLLOWING a strategic review of its operations (TTG Asia e-Daily, January 28, 2013), AirAsia has decided not to launch flights from Singapore to India and China.

 

According to an earlier press statement, AirAsia claims that routes less than three hours allow better revenue returns due to more sectors flown.

 

The carrier’s CEO Tony Fernandes said: “Routes originating out of Singapore to larger-population countries like China and India tend to be more than five hours, hence AirAsia’s decision not to proceed with any venture there in the foreseeable future.”

 

Most major Indian cities such as New Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore and Chennai are approximately a five-hour flight from Singapore or the rest of South-east Asia.

 

Anil Punjabi, chairman-east, Travel Agents Federation of India, said: “The current connectivity AirAsia offers to Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur from Kolkata has been very useful for our inbound and outbound tourist traffic. It is possible that AirAsia may look at a presence in India in the near future as all flights within India to neighbouring countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and the Maldives are all of less than three hours’ flight time.”

 

* Our article initially stated that AirAsia would be ceasing its flights to China and India, which was factually incorrect and has been amended.

 
Print Top Stories
 
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Good
 
COMMENTS
This article is factually wrong. A quick browse of AirAsia\'s route maps would reveal that AirAsia does not have any routes out of Singapore to India and China. The key point raised in the strategic review is that the airline has dropped plans to set up a subsidiary in SIngapore, whose primary purpose would then be to launch flights out of Changi to India and China. However, given that flight times from Singapore to any destination in both countries exceed 3 hours, it thus does not make sense for the Singapore subsidiary to be set up now.
Posted by: Muhammad Hafiz
01-02-2013 00:09:49
I agree 100% with Muhammad. lousy article and wrong facts. the topic actually was \"setting up a subsidiary in SG or not\". which they - right so - decided not to do as the market is already over-served by budget airlines. bad article, poorly researched.
Posted by: Wolf
03-02-2013 23:06:45
 
  POST YOUR COMMENT  
       
  Name:  
Email Address:
Location:
  Comment:  
  Enter the code shown: